Close menu




October 16th, 2025 | 07:00 CEST

Who definitely deserves credit in the fight against cancer: NetraMark, Moderna, BioNTech

  • Biotechnology
  • AI
  • Biotech
  • Cancer
Photo credits: AI

Two biotech pioneers, Moderna and BioNTech, are back in the spotlight after their COVID-19 vaccine success - this time in a race to develop innovative cancer therapies. Both companies rely on mRNA technology to develop personalized cancer vaccines. Speed is crucial here: whoever brings effective treatments to market first could secure billions in market share. At the same time, AI startup NetraMark is entering the stage with novel data analysis that could significantly accelerate research and shape medical progress. We shed light on what is currently driving both the research community and investors.

time to read: 3 minutes | Author: Nico Popp
ISIN: NETRAMARK HOLDINGS INC | CA64119M1059 , MODERNA INC. DL-_0001 | US60770K1079 , BIONTECH SE SPON. ADRS 1 | US09075V1026

Table of contents:


    BioNTech and Moderna in the oncology race

    We Germans often view the biotech market a bit one-sidedly - the success of Mainz-based mRNA pioneer BioNTech still resonates. The Company won the race to develop the first mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 during the pandemic. But just as close as that race was against its US biotech rival Moderna back then, the competition remains tight today when it comes to developing new products, such as those for cancer. It seems that Moderna currently has a slight edge: Together with Merck, the Company is developing the personalized mRNA cancer vaccine mRNA-4157/V940, which, in combination with the immunotherapy drug Keytruda, was able to reduce the risk of relapse in melanoma patients by up to 49% in a Phase II study. This cancer vaccine is considered the first mRNA therapy with proven efficacy in a randomized cancer study, has been granted "Breakthrough Therapy" status by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and is currently in Phase 3. Moderna expects to launch the vaccine in 2027. Moderna is also testing other mRNA candidates against cancer, such as mRNA-4359, which achieved a response rate of 67% in certain melanoma patients in an earlier study and is considered "unique and promising" by the Company.

    BioNTech is also active in this field, but has not been able to generate such headlines recently: BioNTech's pipeline includes the individualized mRNA vaccine BNT122 against various tumors, developed jointly with Roche, which is currently in Phase 2. Another project is BNT111, a fixed antigen mRNA vaccine against skin cancer. The Mainz-based company is focusing on combination therapies – CEO Uğur Şahin believes the future lies in combinations of mRNA vaccination, cell therapy, and chemotherapy to first shrink tumors and then destroy them immunologically.

    Fierce competition in cancer drugs – NetraMark makes studies better and faster

    According to asset manager APO Asset, spending on cancer drugs is expected to rise significantly by 2028, with over 100 new cancer drugs expected to be available by then. In addition to Moderna and BioNTech, many other companies are also competing in the race to develop the most effective therapies. Of course, time is of the essence – whoever is first to market often prevails. This is especially true when drugs or vaccines are similarly effective. The Canadian company NetraMark supports drug studies with its own AI technology. The goal: to make research faster, more precise, and more cost-effective. Every year, research companies spend around USD 240 billion on innovation – NetraMark helps companies achieve greater success with less expenditure. Specifically, NetraMark offers NetraAI, an AI platform that is specifically trained to analyze clinical trial data to uncover hidden patterns and patient subgroups. Unlike many AI companies that focus on screening massive datasets for potential active ingredients, NetraMark specializes in understanding limited, complex study datasets. The core idea here is that in almost every clinical trial, there are heterogeneous patient subgroups - such as non-responders to the drug or subjects who respond strongly to placebos. These "hidden" groups can dilute results and lead to the failure of a therapy that is actually effective. NetraMark's AI identifies such subpopulations in a mathematically robust and explainable way to optimize study design and evaluation. This focus on explainable subgroup identification sets NetraMark apart from many competitors.**

    In a study published in June, NetraAI was tested against established AI models using real clinical data sets (schizophrenia, depression, and cancer). While generic AI models failed to produce clear results, NetraAI was able to identify precise and interpretable patient groups and significantly increase prediction accuracy. For research, this translates into concrete savings: by optimizing inclusion and exclusion criteria in studies, efficacy signals can be detected more clearly, and costly failures can be effectively avoided. This unique selling point has already convinced several of NetraMark's partners in recent quarters. Among others, the Company is collaborating with the renowned contract research organization Worldwide Clinical Trials, which offers NetraAI to its clients. This helps to raise awareness of the solution and paves the way for further collaborations.

    NetraMark solves problems, making the stock attractive

    While it is difficult for investors to predict the upcoming winners in the race to fight cancer, NetraMark offers a comprehensible investment story. As a service provider, the Company helps save costs and accelerate research timelines. As was the case during the gold rush, the business of such solution providers is likely to be more stable than that of biotech adventurers who may rely on a single product in the pipeline. NetraMark's stock has been trading sideways for months, giving investors the opportunity to study the business model at their leisure. However, potential investors should not take too long to decide - with the Company valued at only EUR 65 million, a single corporate announcement could change everything.


    Conflict of interest

    Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as "Relevant Persons") may hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies in the future or may bet on rising or falling prices and thus a conflict of interest may arise in the future. The Relevant Persons reserve the right to buy or sell shares or other financial instruments of the Company at any time (hereinafter each a "Transaction"). Transactions may, under certain circumstances, influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company.

    In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships.

    For this reason, there is a concrete conflict of interest.

    The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies.

    Risk notice

    Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on news.financial. These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such.

    The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user.

    The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use.


    Der Autor

    Nico Popp

    At home in Southern Germany, the passionate stock exchange expert has been accompanying the capital markets for about twenty years. With a soft spot for smaller companies, he is constantly on the lookout for exciting investment stories.

    About the author



    Related comments:

    Commented by André Will-Laudien on June 29th, 2026 | 07:30 CEST

    AI and M&A Frenzy in the Life Sciences Sector: Bayer, Vidac Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Evotec, and Eli Lilly

    • Biotechnology
    • Pharma
    • Biotech
    • AI
    • Investments

    Yes, you read that correctly. Pharmaceutical companies are actively embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and, thanks to lower costs, better validation, and faster study setups, could emerge as winners of the new AI wave in the medium term. Many stocks in the life sciences sector had been overlooked by the market, but investors are now taking notice again. Eli Lilly is betting on AI and expanding its portfolio through targeted acquisitions, including the takeovers of sleep-wake specialist Centessa Pharmaceuticals and blood cancer specialist Ajax. At Evotec and Vidac Pharma, much of the focus is on cancer, while Novo Nordisk faces stiff competition from Eli Lilly's weight-loss drugs. Then came the welcome news regarding Bayer. The Supreme Court ruled that approximately 181,000 individual lawsuits alleging a lack of warning labels on packaging are no longer legally viable, as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified the herbicide glyphosate as safe. Lots of good news, and plenty of opportunities for active investors - we provide a few insights.

    Read

    Commented by Tarik Dede on June 29th, 2026 | 07:20 CEST

    Boom, Thanks to the AI Loop: Broadcom, HPQ Silicon, and GitLab

    • Silicon
    • Hydrogen
    • Batteries
    • AI
    • Defense

    Whether it is the AI revolution, quantum computing, or electric vehicles, the tech sector is booming worldwide—from the Nasdaq to the KOSPI. Keeping pace with this growth requires a massive expansion of infrastructure. Data centers and semiconductor manufacturing capacity are being built out at an unprecedented rate, while memory and chip equipment suppliers are ramping up production. Artificial intelligence is driving this process itself. This phenomenon is known as "recursive self-improvement." AI is currently becoming faster and more capable through three reinforcing mechanisms: it writes better code by building on previous generations of AI, it optimizes hardware—such as the design of next-generation AI chips from Nvidia or Broadcom—and it discovers more efficient circuit designs than human engineers could achieve on their own. The result is a powerful feedback loop that is also delivering major benefits to other industries. Today, we take a closer look at three technology companies that stand to benefit from this trend: Broadcom, HPQ Silicon, and GitLab. Without Broadcom, none of this would be possible.

    Read

    Commented by Tarik Dede on June 29th, 2026 | 06:55 CEST

    No copper, no AI! Freeport McMoran, Power Metallic Mines, and Lundin Mining in Focus

    • Mining
    • PGMs
    • Copper
    • AI

    The whole world is focused on AI stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron Technologies. Behind the scenes, however, demand for raw materials like copper is also growing massively. An AI data center requires enormous amounts of the red metal per megawatt of installed capacity—primarily for power distribution, grounding, and transformers. The demand for copper in AI-optimized data centers is estimated at 30 to 40 metric tonnes per megawatt. Added to this is network infrastructure, where, for example, Nvidia relies on a custom-designed copper cabling system for the internal cabling of its latest NVL72 server architecture. A single AI server rack contains kilometres of copper cabling, as copper offers lower latency and lower power consumption over very short distances compared to alternative materials. And behind the scenes, power grids must be upgraded and expanded. The CRU Group therefore forecasts that global copper demand from data centers and AI alone will rise from around 500,000 metric tonnes today to as much as 2 million metric tonnes annually by 2030. BHP expects global copper demand to increase by an additional 3.4 million metric tonnes by 2030. And this is where the problem comes in. Copper supply cannot grow that quickly, which is why copper prices are also rising steadily. Today, we are looking at the stocks of Freeport-McMoRan, Power Metallic Mines, and Lundin Mining.

    Read