Close menu




October 16th, 2025 | 07:00 CEST

Who definitely deserves credit in the fight against cancer: NetraMark, Moderna, BioNTech

  • Biotechnology
  • AI
  • Biotech
  • Cancer
Photo credits: AI

Two biotech pioneers, Moderna and BioNTech, are back in the spotlight after their COVID-19 vaccine success - this time in a race to develop innovative cancer therapies. Both companies rely on mRNA technology to develop personalized cancer vaccines. Speed is crucial here: whoever brings effective treatments to market first could secure billions in market share. At the same time, AI startup NetraMark is entering the stage with novel data analysis that could significantly accelerate research and shape medical progress. We shed light on what is currently driving both the research community and investors.

time to read: 3 minutes | Author: Nico Popp
ISIN: NETRAMARK HOLDINGS INC | CA64119M1059 , MODERNA INC. DL-_0001 | US60770K1079 , BIONTECH SE SPON. ADRS 1 | US09075V1026

Table of contents:


    BioNTech and Moderna in the oncology race

    We Germans often view the biotech market a bit one-sidedly - the success of Mainz-based mRNA pioneer BioNTech still resonates. The Company won the race to develop the first mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 during the pandemic. But just as close as that race was against its US biotech rival Moderna back then, the competition remains tight today when it comes to developing new products, such as those for cancer. It seems that Moderna currently has a slight edge: Together with Merck, the Company is developing the personalized mRNA cancer vaccine mRNA-4157/V940, which, in combination with the immunotherapy drug Keytruda, was able to reduce the risk of relapse in melanoma patients by up to 49% in a Phase II study. This cancer vaccine is considered the first mRNA therapy with proven efficacy in a randomized cancer study, has been granted "Breakthrough Therapy" status by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and is currently in Phase 3. Moderna expects to launch the vaccine in 2027. Moderna is also testing other mRNA candidates against cancer, such as mRNA-4359, which achieved a response rate of 67% in certain melanoma patients in an earlier study and is considered "unique and promising" by the Company.

    BioNTech is also active in this field, but has not been able to generate such headlines recently: BioNTech's pipeline includes the individualized mRNA vaccine BNT122 against various tumors, developed jointly with Roche, which is currently in Phase 2. Another project is BNT111, a fixed antigen mRNA vaccine against skin cancer. The Mainz-based company is focusing on combination therapies – CEO Uğur Şahin believes the future lies in combinations of mRNA vaccination, cell therapy, and chemotherapy to first shrink tumors and then destroy them immunologically.

    Fierce competition in cancer drugs – NetraMark makes studies better and faster

    According to asset manager APO Asset, spending on cancer drugs is expected to rise significantly by 2028, with over 100 new cancer drugs expected to be available by then. In addition to Moderna and BioNTech, many other companies are also competing in the race to develop the most effective therapies. Of course, time is of the essence – whoever is first to market often prevails. This is especially true when drugs or vaccines are similarly effective. The Canadian company NetraMark supports drug studies with its own AI technology. The goal: to make research faster, more precise, and more cost-effective. Every year, research companies spend around USD 240 billion on innovation – NetraMark helps companies achieve greater success with less expenditure. Specifically, NetraMark offers NetraAI, an AI platform that is specifically trained to analyze clinical trial data to uncover hidden patterns and patient subgroups. Unlike many AI companies that focus on screening massive datasets for potential active ingredients, NetraMark specializes in understanding limited, complex study datasets. The core idea here is that in almost every clinical trial, there are heterogeneous patient subgroups - such as non-responders to the drug or subjects who respond strongly to placebos. These "hidden" groups can dilute results and lead to the failure of a therapy that is actually effective. NetraMark's AI identifies such subpopulations in a mathematically robust and explainable way to optimize study design and evaluation. This focus on explainable subgroup identification sets NetraMark apart from many competitors.**

    In a study published in June, NetraAI was tested against established AI models using real clinical data sets (schizophrenia, depression, and cancer). While generic AI models failed to produce clear results, NetraAI was able to identify precise and interpretable patient groups and significantly increase prediction accuracy. For research, this translates into concrete savings: by optimizing inclusion and exclusion criteria in studies, efficacy signals can be detected more clearly, and costly failures can be effectively avoided. This unique selling point has already convinced several of NetraMark's partners in recent quarters. Among others, the Company is collaborating with the renowned contract research organization Worldwide Clinical Trials, which offers NetraAI to its clients. This helps to raise awareness of the solution and paves the way for further collaborations.

    NetraMark solves problems, making the stock attractive

    While it is difficult for investors to predict the upcoming winners in the race to fight cancer, NetraMark offers a comprehensible investment story. As a service provider, the Company helps save costs and accelerate research timelines. As was the case during the gold rush, the business of such solution providers is likely to be more stable than that of biotech adventurers who may rely on a single product in the pipeline. NetraMark's stock has been trading sideways for months, giving investors the opportunity to study the business model at their leisure. However, potential investors should not take too long to decide - with the Company valued at only EUR 65 million, a single corporate announcement could change everything.

    Watch YouTube video

    Conflict of interest

    Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as "Relevant Persons") may hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies in the future or may bet on rising or falling prices and thus a conflict of interest may arise in the future. The Relevant Persons reserve the right to buy or sell shares or other financial instruments of the Company at any time (hereinafter each a "Transaction"). Transactions may, under certain circumstances, influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company.

    In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships.

    For this reason, there is a concrete conflict of interest.

    The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies.

    Risk notice

    Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on news.financial. These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such.

    The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user.

    The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use.


    Der Autor

    Nico Popp

    Nico Popp

    At home in Southern Germany, the passionate stock exchange expert has been accompanying the capital markets for about twenty years. With a soft spot for smaller companies, he is constantly on the lookout for exciting investment stories.

    About the author



    Related comments:

    Commented by Matthias Schomber on October 12th, 2026 | 05:37 CEST

    Infineon Slides, Chinese Anchor Investor at Puma, and a Potential Chart Breakout at HPQ Silicon! Where Are the Opportunities for Your Portfolio?

    • Technical Analysis
    • Chart Analysis
    • Battery Technology
    • Anta Sports
    • Sporting Goods
    • Chips
    • Chip Giant
    • AI

    Nervousness is rising across the markets. Share prices are being driven by major investors taking stakes, the AI boom, political statements, and the latest developments in the war. While chip giant Infineon is benefiting from a massive AI boost despite market turbulence, China's Anta is gaining influence at Puma and could give the sporting goods manufacturer exactly the fresh momentum it needs. Meanwhile, Canadian technology company HPQ Silicon is approaching a critical technical resistance level. A breakout could open the door to significant upside potential. What opportunities do these three very different stocks offer, and where might an entry point be worthwhile?

    Read

    Commented by Fabian Lorenz on October 12th, 2026 | 05:30 CEST

    After 600% Gains with Moderna! Cardiol Therapeutics Poised for a Revaluation - Analysts See Significant Upside Potential

    • Biotech
    • Research

    With gains of more than 600%, Moderna is the Nasdaq’s best-performing stock so far this year. Much of its future growth potential may already be priced in, prompting Citigroup to recommend selling shares in the mRNA specialist. Analysts, however, see significant upside potential in another biotech company: Cardiol Therapeutics. The Canadian biotechnology company focuses on inflammatory heart diseases, and its lead drug candidate, CardiolRx™, is already in Phase 3 clinical trials. Following strong Phase 2 data, the stock more than doubled between July and September. After a subsequent pullback, could this present an attractive entry opportunity? In a recent interview, the CEO explains why he remains optimistic. Two research firms recommend buying the stock and see the potential for a multiple-fold increase in its share price.

    Read

    Commented by Carsten Mainitz on October 12th, 2026 | 05:28 CEST

    Don’t Miss Out! Cancer Research and Comeback Potential: Vidac Pharma, Bayer and Evotec in Focus!

    • Oncology
    • Cancer Therapy
    • Pharma
    • Biotechnology
    • Clinical Trials
    • Innovation

    New cancer therapies are targeting major medical breakthroughs. For investors, however, the key question is when scientific progress will begin to translate into rising share prices. Vidac Pharma is at a particularly exciting stage in its development. The company is awaiting crucial clinical trial data that could validate its innovative approach to cancer cell metabolism and mark a major milestone. Bayer is expanding its oncology business but must also contend with a range of challenges. Meanwhile, Evotec needs to prove it can turn its research, technology platforms, and strategic partnerships into profitable business opportunities while rebuilding lost investor confidence. Which developments could now trigger a revaluation of these three stocks?

    Read