Close menu




March 25th, 2021 | 08:19 CET

Evotec, PsyBio Therapeutics, MorphoSys - Milestone in Development!

  • Biotechnology
Photo credits: pixabay.com

About 350 million people worldwide live with depression. According to estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), only one in four sufferers receives adequate treatment. With all its limitations, the Corona Crisis has caused the number of unreported cases to skyrocket exorbitantly, making depression the most significant cause of illness above all. Apart from the prescription of antidepressants, which usually have strong side effects, there are few alternative treatment methods. But now, young biotech companies are stepping up to revolutionize the field of "mental health."

time to read: 3 minutes | Author: Stefan Feulner
ISIN: DE0005664809 , CA6936971044 , DE0006632003

Table of contents:


    Long history

    Currently, "magic mushrooms" are one of the hippest topics on the stock markets. But the history of mushrooms containing psychedelic substances goes back thousands of years. The Aztecs of Mexico already used the psilocybin-containing mushrooms for ritual and profane purposes as intoxicating drugs. But it was not until 1957 that Albert Hofmann, who had already discovered LSD, was the first to isolate psilocybin and psilocin as the active substances of the mushroom. The chemical structures of the main active substances are closely related to LSD, so they also produce similar psychoactive effects. In the 1960s, synthetically produced psilocybin was marketed under the name Indocybin® by the pharmaceutical Company Sandoz for experimental and psychotherapeutic purposes. The increasing use as a narcotic drug, especially by representatives of the hippie movement, was cited as one of the reasons for the prohibition of LSD and other psychedelics in the early 1970s.

    Revolutionary approaches

    For many years, there has been an increasing number of studies with volunteers to investigate the possible therapeutic effects of drugs, such as psilocybin or LSD. These studies are looking at the use of psilocybin and other hallucinogens to treat a range of otherwise untreatable mental disorders, such as chronic depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and drug or alcohol addiction. Now, PsyBio Therapeutics aims to bring a unique drug to market. In cooperation with the University of Miami's Department of Psychology, the Canadians are working with other related active ingredients, investigating their interactions, and researching substances that work even better than pure psilocybin. This collaboration has already yielded several patents.

    Global leader

    According to PsyBio CEO Evan Levine, the Company is in pole position regarding research and patent prosecution in the industry. The Company also has a unique selling proposition, which should significantly impact margins in the future. The Company recently filed a process patent that can produce psilocybin using bacteria significantly cheaper, faster and more environmentally friendly than any other published method.

    Earlier this week, PsyBio was able to announce another important step. It was able to start developing its second product candidate, a proprietary biosynthetic formulation of norbaeocystin, in collaboration with the Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts Process Development Unit. Norbaeocystin is an analog of psilocybin and is not a controlled substance. The Company has begun Phase 1 of this process, including the technical transfer of analytical chemistry to identify capture methods for fermentation products as well as key feedstock and metabolites. PsyBio shares were listed on the Canadian Stock Exchange in late February and are also tradable in Frankfurt. The market capitalization is around CAD 40 million. A bet on the future.

    You can read the full interview with PsyBio Therapeutics CEO Evan Levine here: Interview Evan Levine

    Promising cooperation

    The German biotech Company Evotec has announced the successful conclusion of a partnership. The Japanese pharmaceutical Company Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited may use Evotec's RNA platform to identify promising RNA sequences to target small molecule ligands that can be further developed into potential first-in-class therapeutics. In return, Evotec will collect research payments and can expect to receive early-stage, preclinical, clinical and commercial milestone payments of up to the equivalent of EUR 134 m per program. In addition, Evotec is entitled to staggered royalties on the products' net sales resulting from this collaboration. Chart-wise, the stock is facing a decision at the moment. A break of the EUR 30 support would generate a sell signal. We advise investors to wait and see.

    Negative signs

    The MorphoSys share has already broken the support. Since its high at the start of the year, the stock has corrected by just under 50% and was quoted at EUR 75 yesterday. The correction is likely to extend to the next target point at around EUR 70. We currently advise against an investment. Also, fundamentally, we do not see MorphoSys as a buy candidate at the moment. The weak outlook for the full year 2021 still causes uncertainty.


    Conflict of interest

    Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as "Relevant Persons") may in the future hold shares or other financial instruments of the mentioned companies or will bet on rising or falling on rising or falling prices and therefore a conflict of interest may arise in the future. conflict of interest may arise in the future. The Relevant Persons reserve the shares or other financial instruments of the company at any time (hereinafter referred to as the company at any time (hereinafter referred to as a "Transaction"). "Transaction"). Transactions may under certain circumstances influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the of the Company.

    Furthermore, Apaton Finance GmbH reserves the right to enter into future relationships with the company or with third parties in relation to reports on the company. with regard to reports on the company, which are published within the scope of the Apaton Finance GmbH as well as in the social media, on partner sites or in e-mails, on partner sites or in e-mails. The above references to existing conflicts of interest apply apply to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH uses for publications on companies.

    Risk notice

    Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and etc. on news.financial. These contents serve information for readers and does not constitute a call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly. implicitly, they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price be understood. The contents do not replace individual professional investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the share(s) offer to sell the share(s) or other financial instrument(s) in question, nor is it an nor an invitation to buy or sell such.

    The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but rather financial analysis, but rather journalistic or advertising texts. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis decisions or transactions on the basis of the information provided here act completely at their own risk. There is no contractual relationship between between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers. users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the company, but not to the investment decision of the reader or user. or user.

    The acquisition of financial instruments entails high risks that can lead to the total loss of the capital invested. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors are based on careful research on careful research, nevertheless no liability for financial losses financial losses or a content guarantee for topicality, correctness, adequacy and completeness of the contents offered here. contents offered here. Please also note our Terms of use.


    Der Autor

    Stefan Feulner

    The native Franconian has more than 20 years of stock exchange experience and a broadly diversified network.
    He is passionate about analyzing a wide variety of business models and investigating new trends.

    About the author



    Related comments:

    Commented by Nico Popp on January 25th, 2022 | 10:15 CET

    BioNTech, Defence Therapeutics, Nordex: Investors must pay attention here!

    • Biotechnology

    "Defying cancer" was the headline of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung a few days ago. The interview was illustrated with the two leading BioNTech heads, Özlem Türeci and Uğur Şahin. The famous German scientists' statement revolved around further projects for BioNTech and the fight against cancer. At the same time, BioNTech's stock, like many other pandemic winners, dropped. What does this mean for investors now?

    Read

    Commented by Stefan Feulner on January 24th, 2022 | 11:09 CET

    BioNTech, Cardiol Therapeutics, Netflix - The return to normality

    • Biotechnology

    The outbreak of the Corona pandemic triggered gold-rush sentiment among many companies. In addition to vaccine manufacturers such as BioNTech and Moderna, stocks whose technology supported the mandated measures also multiplied. Whether shopping, school, work or even sports, one could suddenly do everything simply in front of a screen. However, after the restrictions and limitations, society longs for normal life to return. These developments can be seen clearly in the share charts and the most recently presented figures.

    Read

    Commented by Carsten Mainitz on January 20th, 2022 | 12:14 CET

    Evotec, Defence Therapeutics, Formycon - Who will benefit from Omicron?

    • Biotechnology

    The Coronavirus has shown that without biotechnology and ongoing research, we are relatively defenseless against the whims of nature. What would have happened if novel technology had not been available to produce potent vaccines in a very short time? Would our intensive care units have been as crowded as they were in Italy at the beginning of the pandemic? Would hospital triage be the norm today? No one can say for sure, but history has shown how epidemics - such as the Spanish flu - have claimed many lives in the past.

    Read