Close menu




April 16th, 2025 | 07:50 CEST

Takeover speculation! What is going on at Pfizer, Sanofi, and NetraMark

  • Biotechnology
  • Biotech
  • Pharma
Photo credits: pixabay.com

Developing drugs is expensive - so expensive that 22% of all Phase III studies fail due to budget constraints, as shown by scientific studies. When pharmaceutical companies discontinue a late-stage project, it also moves the stock markets. Recently, Pfizer pulled the plug on its weight loss drug, Danuglipron. The reason: a participant in the study experienced liver damage. This further backfires on Pfizer in the important market of obesity drugs, leaving it further behind Viking Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. To ensure that more drug trials are successful in the future, the publicly listed tech company NetraMark is relying on AI. The first pharmaceutical multinationals have already set their sights on this hidden gem.

time to read: 3 minutes | Author: Nico Popp
ISIN: PFIZER INC. DL-_05 | US7170811035 , SANOFI SA INHABER EO 2 | FR0000120578 , NETRAMARK HOLDINGS INC | CA64119M1059

Table of contents:


    Drug research is a billion-dollar business

    Pfizer's latest setback shows that it makes perfect sense for large pharmaceutical companies to proceed as they do in the development of new drugs. The multinationals usually adopt a multi-pronged approach and pursue many projects in parallel. In some cases, they only have a stake in projects in order to keep decision-making processes efficient and their cost share as low as possible. Nevertheless, the costs for research and development are enormous. Even if companies like Pfizer or Sanofi are tight-lipped about the details of their costs, there are still some indications. In 2024, Sanofi invested a whopping EUR 7.4 billion in research and development.

    To ensure that these investments are targeted effectively, AI is being increasingly used: at Sanofi, for example, artificial intelligence is used for data collection and analysis, as well as for quality control. "This helps us to collect and evaluate anonymized information faster and more reliably," explains Jessica Werchan, study manager at Sanofi's Clinical Study Unit, on the Company's website. Such technology-based approaches help to improve the quality of the studies and to use resources efficiently.

    NetraMark is tackling the costs and risks in pharmaceutical research

    The Canadian company NetraMark, which specializes in optimizing clinical trials – particularly in Phases 2 and 3, where failure rates are high – goes one step further. The Company's proprietary AI technology analyzes small, high-dimensional data sets to identify subpopulations relevant to success. The goal is to adapt inclusion and exclusion criteria for future study phases in a targeted manner to significantly increase the probability of success. What sounds like trickery is a procedure that the US Food and Drug Administration recommends as useful. After data sets have been optimized using NetraMark's technology, subjects more likely to respond to the active ingredient or show a lower response to placebos can be selected.

    NetraMark focuses on diseases of the central nervous system and cancer, but in principle, the technology can be used in all types of clinical studies. According to NetraMark, a particular highlight is its proprietary "Attractor AI", which can work with particularly small data sets. In contrast to gimmicks with ChatGPT, where results are often difficult to verify, NetraMark focuses on traceability. This allows researchers to systematically improve the study design: The better the design, the lower the risk – and the lower the cost per study.

    Pfizer's fear of the next setback – Will NetraMark become an acquisition candidate?

    The Company is currently testing its technology in collaboration with a major pharmaceutical company and the US National Institute of Health. As NetraMark CEO George Achilleos explained at the International Investment Forum a few weeks ago, the business model is designed to deliver high margins: *"Our gross margins are well over 90%.* Virtually every dollar of revenue goes directly toward covering our operating costs," Achilleos said at the time.

    Although NetraMark's technology is still in the testing phase, the business model is considered extremely interesting within the biotech sector. How to make studies more efficient and cost-effective is a regular topic at industry conferences. Large pharmaceutical companies may seek to secure the technology. Pfizer is likely to be keen to avoid repeating a failure like Danuglipron. Other pharmaceutical companies, such as Sanofi, are currently realigning themselves and want to increase their involvement in the biopharmaceutical sector. In order to make strategic investments, Sanofi wants to sell its majority stake in the consumer healthcare brand Opella. Given the sums involved in the budgets of pharmaceutical multinationals, NetraMark's market capitalization of just under EUR 70 million seems manageable.

    NetraMark is addressing acute challenges in the pharmaceutical industry

    NetraMark's shares have been among the high-flyers in recent months, rising by more than 480% in the past six months. If the Canadian tech company makes a breakthrough, there is still potential: with the billions that pharmaceutical companies spend on research and development every year, even small savings can quickly add up to significant amounts. In addition, pharmaceutical companies can focus on new projects more quickly if studies with little prospect of success are terminated earlier than before. The pharmaceutical industry is transforming and is on the hunt for tomorrow's cash cows – NetraMark is keeping pace with this trend.


    Conflict of interest

    Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as "Relevant Persons") may hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies in the future or may bet on rising or falling prices and thus a conflict of interest may arise in the future. The Relevant Persons reserve the right to buy or sell shares or other financial instruments of the Company at any time (hereinafter each a "Transaction"). Transactions may, under certain circumstances, influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company.

    In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships.

    For this reason, there is a concrete conflict of interest.

    The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies.

    Risk notice

    Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on news.financial. These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such.

    The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user.

    The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use.


    Der Autor

    Nico Popp

    At home in Southern Germany, the passionate stock exchange expert has been accompanying the capital markets for about twenty years. With a soft spot for smaller companies, he is constantly on the lookout for exciting investment stories.

    About the author



    Related comments:

    Commented by Armin Schulz on June 12th, 2026 | 06:40 CEST

    The Biotech and Life Sciences Boom: Evotec, BioNxt Solutions, and Merck – Which Is Worth Investing In?

    • Biotechnology
    • Biotech
    • Pharma
    • LifeSciences

    The life sciences and pharmaceutical industry is undergoing a structural transformation. Value creation is no longer driven by individual blockbuster drugs, but rather by platform technologies, patent portfolios, and strategic deals. This new capital market logic rewards companies with protectable intellectual property and smart licensing agreements—not just pure pipeline developers. For private investors, this creates high-yield niches with reduced regulatory risks. The key question remains: who controls the levers in the innovation ecosystem? Those who recognize this structure early can benefit disproportionately. Today we focus on Evotec, BioNxt Solutions, and Merck.

    Read

    Commented by Tarik Dede on June 11th, 2026 | 07:05 CEST

    Wave of Biotech Acquisitions: Eli Lilly, Vidac Pharma, and GSK in the Spotlight

    • Pharma
    • Biotech
    • Biotechnology
    • Cancer

    Cancer remains one of humanity's greatest scourges, and at the same time, it is by far the largest healthcare market of all. But the old-school pharmaceutical giants are running out of oncology pipeline candidates, and now smaller, far more innovative players are increasingly being acquired. The M&A market is currently experiencing extremely dynamic times. This week, for example, GSK announced the acquisition of Nuvalent for USD 10.6 billion in cash. Gilead Sciences, in turn, struck a deal in April with the German company Tubulis—for a total of USD 5 billion. Shortly thereafter, Eli Lilly offered up to USD 7 billion for Kelonia Therapeutics, just to name a few of this year's deals. That is why we are taking a look at the opportunities in the sector today and putting the stocks of Eli Lilly, Vidac Pharma, and GSK under the microscope!

    Read

    Commented by Armin Schulz on June 11th, 2026 | 06:45 CEST

    With Novo Nordisk, MustGrow Biologics, and Bayer: Positioning for Two Megatrends of the Decade

    • biologicals
    • mustard
    • agritech
    • Biotechnology
    • Biotech

    Created and published on behalf of MustGrow Biologics Corp.

    Two seemingly opposing crises—obesity and food scarcity—are creating major investment opportunities this year. While the obesity epidemic is placing increasing strain on healthcare systems, climate shocks and geopolitical conflicts are threatening global agricultural yields. The biotech sector is addressing both challenges through biological compounds for weight management and crop protection. Demand for effective obesity treatments and sustainable agricultural solutions is rising rapidly. Investors who position themselves early in the beneficiaries of this dual transformation may benefit from above-average returns. This is precisely where the three companies we are taking a closer look at today are positioned: Novo Nordisk, MustGrow Biologics, and Bayer.

    Read