Close menu




July 29th, 2026 | 07:40 CEST

Billion-Dollar Markets of Obesity, Oncology, and Neurology in Focus: Novo Nordisk, Vidac Pharma, and AbbVie

  • Pharma
  • Biotechnology
  • Neurology
  • Obesity
Photo credits: Pixabay

The healthcare industry of the future is driven by three major megatrends: obesity, oncology, and neurology. While the market for cancer drugs is heading toward nearly USD 700 billion and Alzheimer's therapies are booming, the GLP-1 boom has only just begun and has replaced oncology as the largest driver of pipeline value. But not every company will benefit equally from this momentum. The key difference lies in strategic focus and the ability to translate scientific milestones into market success. We take a look at three companies today—Novo Nordisk, Vidac Pharma, and AbbVie—each of which embodies one of these areas.

time to read: 4 minutes | Author: Armin Schulz
ISIN: NOVO NORDISK A/S | DK0062498333 , VIDAC PHARMA HOLDING PLC | GB00BM9XQ619 , ABBVIE INC. DL-_01 | US00287Y1091

Table of contents:


    Novo Nordisk: Driving the Weight-Loss Pill Forward

    Recent developments at Novo Nordisk paint a picture of a company caught between conflicting forces. On the one hand, the European Commission approved the Wegovy tablet in mid-July, marking a significant milestone in the rapidly growing market for oral GLP-1 therapies. On the other hand, the company suffered a setback in February. Its Phase III trial of the combination therapy CagriSema failed to demonstrate non-inferiority to Eli Lilly's Tirzepatide, disappointing investors. The market reacted negatively to the results, although the company's Chief Scientific Officer continues to emphasize the long-term potential of the Semaglutide/Cagrilintide combination.

    The competitive landscape is further intensifying due to legal disputes. Novo Nordisk filed a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, arguing that advertising for Zepbound is based on an outdated dose comparison and fails to take into account the newer, higher-dose Wegovy version. The rationale: a direct comparison is permissible only based on data available at the same time. Lilly rejects the allegations and cites the SURMOUNT-5 study as the "gold standard". At the same time, Canada approved the first generic semaglutide product in July, which could potentially undermine the Danish company's pricing power in other industrialized nations.

    Despite these challenges, management remains on the offensive. The DKK 15 billion share buyback program is underway. At the same time, the company is investing in production infrastructure in both China and the Czech Republic to ensure supply security in the coming years. The quarterly results due on August 5 and management's outlook will be decisive in determining whether the share's recent recovery continues or concerns about competition and pipeline disappointments prevail.

    Vidac Pharma: Metabolic Approach Gains Momentum

    The EMA approval for the Phase 2b trial of VDA-1102 in highly proliferative actinic keratosis marked the start of accelerated clinical progress. The first patient was treated as early as February, and recruitment of all 39 patients was completed within the planned timeframe by June. On that occasion, the company announced that there had been no serious treatment-related side effects to date. The expected topline data following the follow-up phase could pave the way for a subsequent Phase 3 trial. For a small biotech company, this represents a rare level of operational discipline that strengthens confidence in its ability to execute.

    Strategic expansion into continental Europe is also taking shape. The inclusion of the planned French subsidiary, Eutopos Pharma, in the Quest for Health accelerator in July provides access to the BioValley network, which includes partners from academia, industry, and investments. With Dr. Séverine Sigrist as the subsidiary's CEO-designate, Vidac is bringing experienced biotech expertise on board. The Strasbourg location is set to serve as a hub for research, clinical trials, and partnerships in the future. This is a smart move to operate closer to European markets and investors.

    The pipeline rests on several pillars. VDA-1102 is being developed for two indications (AK and CTCL), while the systemic candidate VDA-1275 for solid tumours is in the preclinical IND-enabling phase. Recent patent grants in the US and Canada secure the core mechanism well into the 2040s. Management and major shareholders provided additional capital in February. This is a clear commitment to their own investment thesis. The growing scientific recognition of the HK2 approach, most recently evident at scientific conferences, underscores its potential to impact beyond dermatology and into other hyperproliferative diseases.

    Watch YouTube video

    AbbVie: With a Focus on Immunology and a New Strategic Direction

    The announced acquisition of Apogee Therapeutics for USD 10.9 billion marks a strategic turning point. With Zumilokibart, AbbVie secures a promising candidate for atopic dermatitis that complements its immunology portfolio. While the deal's full debt financing preserves the dividend fund, it increases debt to approximately USD 83 billion. The market reacted surprisingly positively. This is a clear signal that investors recognize the long-term rationale behind the move. The Phase 2 data show promising results, but proof must be provided in Phase 3. The real question remains whether AbbVie is successfully anticipating the next cycle of patent expirations.

    The Neuroscience portfolio generated approximately USD 2.9 billion in the first quarter of 2026, an increase of 26%. Qulipta and Vyalev, in particular, are driving growth, while Botox Therapeutic and Vraylar are delivering stable contributions. Management sees three pillars here, each with at least USD 5 billion in potential. The pipeline programs Tavapadon for Parkinson's disease and ABBV-1758 for Alzheimer's disease keep further options open. The recent approvals of Boey in Europe and Canada, as well as SKINVIVE in the US, underscore the company's operational breadth. For investors, the key question remains whether the current momentum will continue and whether the pipeline will advance to the next stage of development.

    With an expected P/E ratio of 18, AbbVie trades slightly below the industry average, despite above-average margins and double-digit revenue growth rates. The current dividend yield of around 2.7% significantly exceeds the S&P 500 average, and the 60% free cash flow payout ratio appears sustainable. However, the recent profit warning, driven by one-time charges in the current quarter, highlights the volatility of earnings performance. Analysts expect earnings per share of around USD 14.24 for 2026, but the outlook remains dependent on the integration of the acquisition and the success of the pipeline. The quarterly report due on July 31 will show whether expectations can be met.


    The three companies represent different areas of healthcare megatrends. Novo Nordisk dominates obesity therapy but is struggling with growing competitive pressure and clinical setbacks, which are weighing on its share price. Vidac Pharma, on the other hand, presents itself as an up-and-coming biotech company with ongoing clinical trials, robust patent protection extending into the 2040s, and growing scientific recognition of its HK2 approach. The upcoming Phase 2b data could significantly boost the company's value. AbbVie is countering patent expirations with acquisitions worth billions and is performing well in the neurology sector, but must manage integration and high debt.


    Conflict of interest

    Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as "Relevant Persons") currently hold or hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies and speculate on their price developments. In this respect, they intend to sell or acquire shares or other financial instruments of the companies (hereinafter each referred to as a "Transaction"). Transactions may thereby influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company.
    In this respect, there is a concrete conflict of interest in the reporting on the companies.

    In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships.
    For this reason, there is also a concrete conflict of interest.
    The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies.

    Risk notice

    Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on news.financial. These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such.

    The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user.

    The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use.


    Der Autor

    Armin Schulz

    Armin Schulz

    Born in Mönchengladbach, he studied business administration in the Netherlands. In the course of his studies he came into contact with the stock exchange for the first time. He has more than 25 years of experience in stock market business.

    About the author



    Related comments:

    Commented by Stefan Feulner on October 21st, 2026 | 05:38 CEST

    Regeneron, Vidac Pharma, Krystal Biotech: New Active Ingredients, Enormous Stock Market Potential

    • Biotechnology

    Cancer treatment is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Rather than relying solely on conventional chemotherapy, new approaches increasingly target the biological mechanisms that drive tumours. In particular, immunotherapies, gene therapies and interventions targeting cellular metabolism are opening up new possibilities for treating skin cancer. As approved medicines reach more patients, innovative biotech companies face key clinical milestones. Commercial opportunities are substantial, as demand for effective, well-tolerated treatments continues to grow. The decisive factor will be which technologies can confirm their promising results in larger clinical trials.

    Read

    Commented by Stefan Feulner on October 20th, 2026 | 05:23 CEST

    AstraZeneca, Cardiol Therapeutics, Kiniksa – New hope for heart patients

    • Biotechnology

    Cardiovascular diseases remain among the greatest medical challenges worldwide. While established pharmaceutical groups invest billions in new active ingredients and artificial intelligence, specialised biotech companies are developing targeted therapies for conditions that have so far been difficult to treat, such as recurrent pericarditis. Patients often suffer from painful relapses and require long-term treatment. New medicines could fundamentally change how these conditions are managed. For investors, this brings into focus companies that already market approved products or are awaiting pivotal clinical trial results.

    Read

    Commented by Carsten Mainitz on October 14th, 2026 | 05:25 CEST

    Who Profits When Patents Expire? The Billion-Euro Race Between Formycon, Fresenius and Pfizer

    • Biosimilar
    • FDA
    • Milestone
    • Cancer therapy
    • Pharma
    • Patents
    • Investments

    When patent protection for high-revenue biopharmaceuticals expires, a billion-euro market for follow-on products emerges. Michael Sen, head of the German healthcare group Fresenius SE, cites an impressive figure. By 2035, this could generate around EUR 180 billion in revenue. In particular, biosimilars, biotechnologically produced follow-on medicines that are highly similar in composition to the original medicine and equivalent in quality, efficacy and safety, are forecast to grow significantly. Moreover, biosimilars can strengthen competition and reduce treatment costs. Formycon stands out as a pure play. The company recently reached a crucial milestone. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted the marketing authorisation application, the first publicly known application of its kind, for FYB206, a biosimilar candidate to the cancer medicine Keytruda, for review. Keytruda generates around USD 32 billion in annual revenue, making it the world's highest-revenue medicine. Fresenius is strengthening its positioning in the biosimilar sector through an acquisition. Pfizer needs new growth drivers. Who is best positioned for the year-end rally?

    Read